Visit chill's column >>

CHILLHome Page

← Cycling leads to Wisdom
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 115; Links Seeded: 879
Member Since: 11/2005

Conspiracy Theories: The Declining Dollar and M3

M2 Is Flat, N3 Is skyrocketing.
Source: Shadowstats

advertisement

Headlines have been full of stories regarding the ever weakening dollar and there's been lots of good discussion here at Newsvine - see Iran to replace dollar with euro. It's a complicated but important subject as discussed here in a previous article I posted The Decline and Fall of the American Dollar - Why it Matters.

This article will not deal with why it matters, but more specifically on the little understood subject of money supply and recent shenanigans that have got conspiracy theorists frothing at the mouth.

OK, sounds good but what is money supply?

It's complex even for experts (and I am certainly no expert) but at its simplest, the value of a currency (money) is based on supply and demand. The greater the supply, the less people will pay for an asset. The greater the demand for an asset the higher it's price.

Technically, economists in the USA (it can be different elsewhere) define Money as follows:

  • M0: The total of all physical currency, plus accounts at the central bank which can be exchanged for physical currency.
  • M1: M0 + the amount in demand accounts ("checking" or "current" accounts).
  • M2: M1 + most savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificate of deposit accounts (CDs) of under $100,000.
  • M3: M2 + all other CDs, deposits of eurodollars and repurchase agreements.

See Wikipedia for more

Umm OK, But how is Money Supply controlled?

See Wikipedia here.

The Federal Reserve System controls the size of the money supply by conducting open market operations, in which the Federal Reserve lends or purchases specific types of securities with authorized participants, known as primary dealers. The Open Market Desk has two main tools to adjust the monetary supply: repurchase agreements and outright transactions.

Note there are other ways to effect the money supply like bank reserve requirements --- but I am trying to be brief. Links provide more data.

Yawn. Boring! Get to the Conspiracy Part

OK, fair enough. On November 2005, the federal reserve announced that it would stop publishing M3 effective March 2006. Read that sentence again please. It's a big one!

Hey, but doesn't M3 include Repurchase Agreements conducted by the fed? And M3 also includes EURO Dollars?

Yes, great, you are paying attention!

Euro Dollars:
From Wikipedia here:

Eurodollars are deposits denominated in United States dollars at banks outside the United States, and thus are not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve. Consequently, such deposits are subject to much less regulation than similar deposits within the United States, allowing for higher margins.

Note, EURO dollars aren't necessarily located in Europe. The term is left over from post WW2 rebuilding of Europe. It would include for example much of the $Trillion in dollar reserves held by China. Or much of the petro dollars owned by Arab nations. It's a big number.

So why did the Fed stop tracking M3?

Well first the non conspiracy theory answer: In a November Wall Street Journal article:

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said two weeks ago in a speech at a speech in Europe that money-supply measures haven't proven reliable enough to play an important part in policy strategy. European Central Bank head Jean-Claude Trichet said prior to this speech that "a model of monetary policy that includes no role for money is incomplete in some important respects."

Back To the Conspiracy Theories. From the same WSJ article:

But M3 is the money-supply measure increasing the fastest. Shadowstats, which cobbles M3 back together from various Fed data releases and other estimates, put it at 9.6% growth in October, highest since March 2002. Some believe its growth is fueling M&A and the stock market (the S&P 500 has gone more than 90 days now without a 1% one-day decline, longest since 1995). "People are swapping cash for hard assets, be it copper mines, or timberlands or office buildings or gold," says Mr. Ritholtz. "There's a lot of cash, and people are playing 'hot potato' to get rid of it as fast as possible."

A chart by this same Shadowstats (see chart) shows a flat M2 while M3 surges. Basically, the Fed is pretending to tighten with its continuous interest rate hikes and publishing of M2. While the no longer published M3 spikes. The Fed is not tightening credit if it is increasing the Money Supply

Any more conspiracy theories?

Yes, A big one. In November 2006 the right wing New York Post published the following article: US Treasury Quietly Doing the Feds Work It basically describes how the Treasury Department is using similar powers as the Fed in UNPUBLISHED and little-known-about Repurchase Agreements to increase the money supply.

"FOR the past few years the U.S. Treasury has been quietly involved in what the financial markets call "repo" agreements and this near-secret operation could explain why the nation's money supply seems to be confoundingly large.

It might also explain why Washington decided earlier this year to stop publishing M3 money supply figures, the broadest and most popular measure of money in circulation. Experts worry whenever there is too much money - liquidity - in the financial system because it can lead to things like price spirals in the housing market and bubbles in stocks.

But even more worrisome for the financial markets than too much liquidity would be an inability to track the amount of money being pumped into the financial system.

it looks as if the Treasury has created a way to duplicate the Fed's power. And that is a disturbing possibility unless it is somehow monitored.

Those last two sentences say it all. Scary stuff. Many mainstream economists believe one major factor in the housing bubble, stock market surge, and dollar decline, is due to this hidden increase in money supply. And maybe Bush has his hidden hand in this conspiracy.

Is Anyone Doing Anything About This? Well many investors are looking abroad to protect against the ever declining dollar. As linked above, Iran and other nations are reducing their US dollar exposure. Finally, Republican Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) has a bill pending bill H.R. 4892: Sunshine in Monetary Policy Act mandating the Fed to publish M3 weekly.

As a final note, you might ask, why is inflation not increasing if money supply is out of control? That could be a whole other article on the questionable reliability of inflation statistics. And I think we are all tired now.

Here's a primer though: Inflation Vanquished

  • 18 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
26
6.6
{"commentId":435261,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

Claus asked for more economic articles. Hopefully not too boring.

{"commentId":435261,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:08 AM EST
{"commentId":435377,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

This is great; people need to look at the real economic picture. I was hoping for a juicier conspiracy section, the dark side of the privatized FED, but your explanation was so good I worked through it. A great source for these issues affecting individuals and corrupt government behind the policies, not much conspiracy but lots of dirt, try Catherine Austin Fitts site. Everything from the Treasury's missing trillions to practical investing.

{"commentId":435377,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:25 AM EST
{"commentId":435438,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

hehehe,

I was hoping for a juicier conspiracy section

Hi Pamela, the blogosphere is full of conspiracy ranting on this subject and I toyed with using some of their quotes. I tried to keep things calm, partly because I think it's not a whacko subject ... although I needed a title to add a little spice to an important yet very dull subject. :-)

thanks for link

{"commentId":435438,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:08 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":435292,"authorDomain":"spiffie"}

I can't say that I ever thought I would appreciate something Ron Paul did. Let's hope it passes. I'm all for more transparency in government.

{"commentId":435292,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"spiffie"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:53 AM EST
{"commentId":435313,"authorDomain":"thepef"}

I agree, this along with the Transparency bill will only help.

{"commentId":435313,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"thepef"}
  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:15 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":435525,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

Money in it's broadest sense or the monetary supply is the value of all assets in the group (in this case all assets in and of US citizens). Since value is not a fixed concept (something command economies have problems with) that value is always changing from moment to moment. A market system was developed to keep the real value and the nominal value as close together as possible, hence floated currencies. When the dollar falls it means in the large view that the perceived value of all US assets is less in respect to assets of non-US citizens. Because of trade inefficiencies, reporting inaccuracies, and plain politics different currency bases are valued as well for non-real reasons which has artificially supported US currency in the recent past. This reflect the risk of the government in question that detracts from the value of the country in total, the US has traditionally been considered one of if not the lowest risk currency and has had a premium over the real value for that reason.

M3 includes foreign assets denominated in US dollars. The federal government predictions of the size of those assets varied greatly and was inconsistent because getting accurate reports is difficult to say the least. So when the M3 is calculated inaccurately then used to produce policy, was that a good idea? And should the US government try and maintain currency value while considering assets not inside it's scope? That is double-dipping, the currency in those home countries already count those assets, counting them against the US total as well makes for a very inaccurate world money supply picture. It's also amusingly enough one of the truly valid complaints about US foreign arrogance to count their assets in the US money supply.

So why has M3 increased in the last few years faster than before? Because the world is currently less stable than in the 90s and US currency has traditionally been a safe harbor of value during instability. People in other countries value their own assets in terms of US dollars as a real value measure, the larger of those transactions makes it into various M3 surveys and the reported value goes up. The Euro though is starting to break into the market of stable currencies worldwide, and private economists valuing the same concept as the M3 for the Euro will show it raising quickly as well.

{"commentId":435525,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"kylen"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:14 AM EST
{"commentId":435551,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

Hi Kyle,

Thanks for detailed thoughts. And you more than likely know more about this than me.

Thoughts: There is no doubt that there have been accounting and technical issues that plague the accuracy and usefulness of M3 and this is no doubt what is behind the Fed Chairman's comments.

However, it seems to me that ignoring it is throwing the baby out with the bath water. Understanding Money supply is critical in understanding inflationary pressures. One of the prime roles of the Fed is to limit (or exand) credit to help manage the rate of economic growth or contraction. Just raising and lowering the setting the Discount rate and managing the fed Funds rate.

For example, ignoring for example the liquidity that the Treasury appears to be throwing into the economy (it is not included in fed reports) seems shortsighted.

{"commentId":435551,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:28 AM EST
{"commentId":435703,"authorDomain":"kylen"}

The recent TIO program is mainly a more efficient use of short term funds on the Treasurys part. The change more recently make the process more transparent leading to strange articles like the one cited. It's actually very interesting because now data is more available on short day liquidity rates by checking out their auctions here.

Since these auctions are all valuing in with stop caps at the fed funds rate there is if anything a slight decrease in the money supply but only at low demand. Demand has stayed high as reflected in the bid to cover ratio so there is no real effect on the overall supply from these auctions. Increased short term liquidity without increasing money supply only serves to make markets more efficient and will not lead to the investment issues that article fears.

{"commentId":435703,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"kylen"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:28 AM EST
{"commentId":695180,"authorDomain":"Entelechy"}
So when the M3 is calculated inaccurately then used to produce policy, was that a good idea?

No one's forcing the Fed to use their statistics. They can read tea leaves if they like. Hiding data, however, is pretty suspicious -- and in this case it hides serious imbalances in our banking system. Large amounts of repos means more bank reserves and thus it contributes to high asset prices and is also very likely causing the record numbers of leveraged buyouts. This is not a benign development.

And should the US government try and maintain currency value while considering assets not inside it's scope?

Borders are artificial lines on a map. I would certainly hope that the Fed keeps track of the liquidity that crosses them. (In reality, they do keep track of this. They're just making it hard for anyone else to do so.)

{"commentId":695180,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"Entelechy"}
  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Wed May 9, 2007 12:31 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":4245903,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

Here's a harbinger of troubles with a vanishing M3 figure, a blast from the past when news that the AP wasn't focused on led the more well read pieces at Newsvine.  Cheers to Chill and the Gang!! 

{"commentId":4245903,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Dec 1, 2008 11:28 AM EST
{"commentId":4255205,"authorDomain":"SthPacific"}

Thanks for the link Pamela Drew

{"commentId":4255205,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"SthPacific"}
  • 3 votes
#4.1 - Tue Dec 2, 2008 1:18 AM EST
{"commentId":4258969,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

:~) 

{"commentId":4258969,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 2 votes
#4.2 - Tue Dec 2, 2008 12:01 PM EST
{"commentId":4259767,"authorDomain":"raatkiraani"}

And I wonder if our elusive viner resurfaces from his chiller to acknowledge that his harbinger took a full 2 years to surface.

Now I wonder if the fixers read this article and enacted reality from it. Or is our elusive Viner a modern day seer of conspiracies to last us a few more millenia going forward? Like that other guy from somewhere in France. Who was it? Nostrada......

I gets the chills......

{"commentId":4259767,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"raatkiraani"}
  • 2 votes
#4.3 - Tue Dec 2, 2008 12:55 PM EST
{"commentId":4268479,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

It makes you miss that brief and shining moment, when great minds and cutting edge thinking were the front page's most active stories on the front page of Newsvine.  Now we have 3 votes 3,000 comments on Joe the Plumber.  Damn nice to have been here once upon a time when it was so much of the magic and so little of the mass media.  

{"commentId":4268479,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 2 votes
#4.4 - Tue Dec 2, 2008 11:11 PM EST
{"commentId":4270134,"authorDomain":"raatkiraani"}

Yup. Mass media and mess-up sockpuppets.

{"commentId":4270134,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"raatkiraani"}
  • 2 votes
#4.5 - Wed Dec 3, 2008 5:09 AM EST
{"commentId":4320439,"authorDomain":"SthPacific"}

HA I know how you feel, I did want to comment on this, But hey we have been banging away on this subject here for three years, and now that its too late to do anything about it, people are starting to take an interest in it. Well I guess me and Chill will have to write a post mortem then in a year or two, 

{"commentId":4320439,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"SthPacific"}
  • 3 votes
#4.6 - Sat Dec 6, 2008 9:18 AM EST
Reply
{"commentId":5870864,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

Damn Chill, you just keep getting more brilliant in hindsight!!

{"commentId":5870864,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:49 AM EDT
{"commentId":6076208,"authorDomain":"chill888"}

ha

I visit my old stomping grounds for the first time in months and my fav Pamela is flirting with me

;)

Hope you are well

{"commentId":6076208,"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987","authorDomain":"chill888"}
  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"62116","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"62116","contentId":"487987"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking